What are your guys' opinion on William Lane Craig? He seemed some quite profound arguments that didn't just sway away from the evidence, but tackled genuine logical arguments.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: February 3, 2025, 4:08 pm
Thread Rating:
|
Ok I admit it
|
Way to stay on topic and address the points from the previous post....
   (March 5, 2014 at 3:05 pm)JesusLover1 Wrote:(March 5, 2014 at 3:05 pm)LostLocke Wrote: Which is par for the course, right? Failing to provide a response is viewed as a cop out. Apologetics (sp?) often use that technique. Raise a lot of questions, then ignore the responses if they don't match what they wanted to hear and bring up all new unrelated questions. Address the points raised. Admit the 'opposition' made a salient point that you find your self unable to refute, or refute it. Don't traipse around the forum leaving unacknowledged arguments behind you like bread crumbs.
NOT logic:
1. Claim to have logic 2. Throw a tantrum when asked to present it 3. Claim you've already presented it 4. Repeat step 1 *Rampant.A.I.'s quote
If I don't respond to someone's argument it usually means I agree with them, I do understand in a lot of aspects God makes NO sense.
A little acknowledgement of that agreement goes a long way around here. It's just basic manners really.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
![[Image: sawyer.gif]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=3.bp.blogspot.com%2F-s1AdWg0aGyw%2FUZid1fdRubI%2FAAAAAAAAL5Y%2F3Ed_ayMid6c%2Fs1600%2Fsawyer.gif)
Users browsing this thread: 15 Guest(s)
