(March 13, 2014 at 4:56 pm)futilethewinds Wrote:the purpose of his attacks were to get the manifesto published and he did. The logic in it is very sound and the fact that there is genius behnid the writing says alot about the disturbing society we live in(March 13, 2014 at 4:54 pm)jimmyk2190 Wrote: he talks about surrogate activities 1effortless 2 very difficult 3 impossibleIf he couldn't be a successful politician, he could have been a successful activist. His terrorist tactics didn't help anyone.
do you think he could have been elected without support of the media it falls into a 3
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 25, 2024, 11:20 pm
Thread Rating:
the unabomber
|
(March 13, 2014 at 4:45 pm)jimmyk2190 Wrote:(March 13, 2014 at 4:43 pm)Beccs Wrote: Intelligence doesn't stop him being a psycho. So it's okay for anti-abortionists to bomb doctors who provide abortion services because they perceive them as evil? Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni: "You did WHAT? With WHO? WHERE???" (March 13, 2014 at 4:58 pm)jimmyk2190 Wrote: the purpose of his attacks were to get the manifesto published and he did. The logic in it is very sound and the fact that there is genius behnid the writing says alot about the disturbing society we live inThere were definitely other ways he could have gotten his manifesto published. RE: the unabomber
March 13, 2014 at 5:02 pm
(This post was last modified: March 13, 2014 at 5:03 pm by nintendo048.)
(March 13, 2014 at 4:59 pm)Beccs Wrote:really so you dont see industrialists as profiting off the blood of others , religion from the blood of its followers. And the system as a whole from the hatred that different demographics have for each other. Also wats you deal with him he was for the average person.(March 13, 2014 at 4:45 pm)jimmyk2190 Wrote: I had this exact debate with many of myb friends and family members fine he killed people but he killed bad people not you and me average people. He went for ceo's. And a man with A high IQ left behind a manifesto that the average man can read and educate the masses with how man geniiuses do that??? (March 13, 2014 at 4:59 pm)Beccs Wrote:(March 13, 2014 at 4:45 pm)jimmyk2190 Wrote: I had this exact debate with many of myb friends and family members fine he killed people but he killed bad people not you and me average people. He went for ceo's. And a man with A high IQ left behind a manifesto that the average man can read and educate the masses with how man geniiuses do that??? i feel he in an exception to that rule (March 13, 2014 at 4:45 pm)jimmyk2190 Wrote: I had this exact debate with many of myb friends and family members fine he killed people but he killed bad people not you and me average people. He went for ceo's. And a man with A high IQ left behind a manifesto that the average man can read and educate the masses with how man geniiuses do that??? He tried to destroy an in flight aircraft! So much for your 'just CEOs' pet theory, the absurdity of which has already been pointed out. There are ways to engage society at large to communicate concerns about the future of the race and hatred for 'the system' other than threatening to continue bombing innocent people until one's diatribe is published. Breivik quoted Kaczynski in his manifesto, what does that tell you? (March 13, 2014 at 5:04 pm)Cato Wrote:(March 13, 2014 at 4:45 pm)jimmyk2190 Wrote: I had this exact debate with many of myb friends and family members fine he killed people but he killed bad people not you and me average people. He went for ceo's. And a man with A high IQ left behind a manifesto that the average man can read and educate the masses with how man geniiuses do that??? i know that brevick did and i know that brevick was a terrible awful man but that has nothing do with the content of the article or the fact that ted was a genius (March 13, 2014 at 5:02 pm)jimmyk2190 Wrote:(March 13, 2014 at 4:59 pm)Beccs Wrote: So it's okay for anti-abortionists to bomb doctors who provide abortion services because they perceive them as evil?really so you dont see industrialists as profiting off the blood of others , religion from the blood of its followers. And the system as a whole from the hatred that different demographics have for each other. Also wats you deal with him he was for the average person. To answer your original questions before your edit: I do find some industrialists, church leaders, etc, to be a blight on the butt of humanity. That doesn't justify me going out and killing them. I personally have strong opinions on some of the patients who have come through my hospital/office over the years. I don't have the right to deny them treatment just because I have a personal dislike for them or what they do. Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni: "You did WHAT? With WHO? WHERE???" (March 13, 2014 at 5:04 pm)Cato Wrote:ted was right though we live in a troubled scoiety though(March 13, 2014 at 4:45 pm)jimmyk2190 Wrote: I had this exact debate with many of myb friends and family members fine he killed people but he killed bad people not you and me average people. He went for ceo's. And a man with A high IQ left behind a manifesto that the average man can read and educate the masses with how man geniiuses do that???
Okay, seriously, I hope someone in jimmy's life sees what he's been posting on this site and intervenes by putting him on medication or committing him or something.
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)