(April 26, 2014 at 10:32 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: [This tread is about transitional fossils
You're hardly in a legitimate position to complain about posts being irrelevant.
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: February 8, 2025, 5:27 pm
Thread Rating:
|
Argument #1: Transitional Fossils
|
 You're hardly in a legitimate position to complain about posts being irrelevant.  RE: Argument #1: Transitional Fossils
April 28, 2014 at 2:23 pm
(This post was last modified: April 28, 2014 at 2:24 pm by Anomalocaris.)
(April 27, 2014 at 9:54 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: I would only go if you pay for my plane ticket round trip, provide me room and board, and Stimbo, Esq, Steel Curtain, and Minimalist come as well. If you had stopped at 'too far', you'd have sounded like less of a putz. You sound like a teenager making excuses for not accepting a dare by setting unreasonable conditions.
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.
 (April 26, 2014 at 6:12 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: I have numeral prophesies that have become fulfilled. I guarantee they don't have the success rate of mine. In fact, I foresee it.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
I hope these arguments get better as we go along and he's saving the best for last.
When do we get to hear number two? I'm going to be polite here and say we seem to have reached a stalemate...  RE: Argument #1: Transitional Fossils
April 28, 2014 at 2:57 pm
(This post was last modified: April 28, 2014 at 2:58 pm by RobbyPants.)
Revelation777, when are you going to post question #2, since this thread was already answered on page 1?
Edit: I missed your post, Jesus_Wept. I wouldn't say that this was stalemated. Rev's questions were answered.  (April 28, 2014 at 2:57 pm)RobbyPants Wrote: Revelation777, when are you going to post question #2, since this thread was already answered on page 1? Yes, time for number 2, Rev777. You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence. (April 28, 2014 at 2:57 pm)RobbyPants Wrote: Edit: I missed your post, Jesus_Wept. I wouldn't say that this was stalemated. Rev's questions were answered. I meant stalemate in the sense that nobody is getting anywhere and no further moves seem possible, not that it's a draw. Like I said, I was trying to be polite, to get him to hurry up and post number two instead of wasting any more time on this thread. 
It's ok, he's probably just rounding up the seal, elephants and clowns for the next argument thread, and setting up the tent.
 (April 28, 2014 at 3:37 pm)Rampant.A.I. Wrote: It's ok, he's probably just rounding up the seal, elephants and clowns for the next argument thread, and setting up the tent. As in, "If god isn't real how can so many clowns fit into one car?" 
Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni: "You did WHAT? With WHO? WHERE???" |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 13 Guest(s)
