Godels theorem is invalide for 5 reasons

[shakuntala]

This work proves Godels theorem is invalide for 5 reasons
[SNIP]

here are 3
1) Godel cant tell us what makes a mathematics statement true thus his theorem is meaningless -as the theorem is about there being true mathematic statements which cant be proven

2) the axiom of the system he uses ie axiom of reducibility outlaws/bans his G statement -it is this G statement which Godel uses to prove his theorem

3) a consequence of Godels theorem is that all provable mathematic statements cant be true-thus placing his proof in paradox

4)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6del%...ss_theorem

"...For each consistent formal theory T having the required small amount of number theory
… provability-within-the-theory-T is not the same as truth; the theory T is incomplete....."


Now it is said godel PROVED
"there are true mathematical statements which cant be proven"
in other words
truth does not equate with proof.

if that theorem is true
then his theorem is false

PROOF
for if the theorem is true-because he proved it
then truth does equate with proof- as it is implied that his proof makes the theorem true
but his theorem says
truth does not equate with proof.
thus a paradox

[Alex K]

@shakuntala

Stop spamming and linking to crap or you'll be banned.

Read the rules!

[vorlon13]

The phartwang is strong with this dipthong

[DramaQueen]

Can someone explain to me what's going on? ?

[Alex K]

Can someone explain to me what's going on? ?

Some strange person is spamming the forum with crackpot stuff, and the Mods are all asleep I suppose. Nothing unusual

[Thumpalumpacus]

This is what happens when psych majors do math.

[Fidel_Castronaut]

Can someone explain to me what's going on? ?

Some strange person is spamming the forum with crackpot stuff, and the Mods are all asleep I suppose. Nothing unusual

Hey! I'm not asleep, merely resting my eyes.

[Alex K]

Hey! I'm not asleep, merely resting my eyes.

As long as you're not an ex mod

[agnesi]

This work proves Godels theorem is invalide for 5 reasons
[...]
2) the axiom of the system he uses ie axiom of reducibility outlaws/bans his G statement -it is this G statement which Godel uses to prove his theorem
[...]

I'm afraid your discussion of Kurt Gödel's theorem is incomplete. Your treatment of his G statement is not spot on.