Stories

[The Reality Salesman01]

Lol...I haven't the slightest clue why a buffalo came to mind rather than anything else....

[Jenny A]

I've been away for a while, sorry if this one has already been spread around. I like this guy's videos and I've just see this one for the first time. Like the other ones he's made, it's pretty damn good and I'm always interested in reading what you all have to add.

---

See ya around!

---

It isn't just a god thing either. I love historical novels, but I make it a practice to read about the events again after reading one, because stories will make you believe in fiction.

There's a reason politicians are almost as fond of stories as preachers.

[Godscreated]

---

I see the problem with his stories, I'm not biased towards them. That is the same thing you're saying, right. I listened with open ears, unlike you would do. I saw the problems in his stories that he was applying to the first story. Unlike you I was able to give a statement without bashing someone. You are arguing from the assumption there's no God, yet you lack the proof of this. To make such an argument, you need to argue from a point and you have none.

GC

---

Arguing from the assumption that there's no God? No. I don't believe in God. I'm arguing with someone who believes in God. I can assume there isn't a buffalo in my refrigerator. I can assume that because I know what a buffalo is and I have an understanding of what could fit in my refrigerator. I can assume that more reasonable objects are not in my refrigerator such as sour kraut because I don't eat it or buy it and therefore I can safely assume there's no sout kraut in my fridge. I don't know anything about gods at all. I can't even begin to tell you why a God isn't in my fridge or anywhere else for that matter. "Assume" does not and cannot accurately describe my attitude toward the word "God". If you believe in God, and you attempt to convince me, I can reject your belief on the basis of your descriptions. I don't have to know or assume anything about gods to do that. Your words are fallible and the logical inconsistencies are enough to prevent me from adding Gods to a list of things that may or may not be in my refridgetator, much less anywhere else. Do you understand?

I understand, it eats at your craw you can't disprove my God, see I have all the proof I need, just because you do not accept it doesn't mean it's invalid, on the contrary when one argues against my God it gives validity to my God, it would take an insane person to argue against something they can prove doesn't exist.

GC

[Jenny A]

. . . it would take an insane person to argue against something they can prove doesn't exist.

GC

So you won't argue against Zeus, unicorns, Nessy, and invisible purple nothings?

[The Reality Salesman01]

---

Arguing from the assumption that there's no God? No. I don't believe in God. I'm arguing with someone who believes in God. I can assume there isn't a buffalo in my refrigerator. I can assume that because I know what a buffalo is and I have an understanding of what could fit in my refrigerator. I can assume that more reasonable objects are not in my refrigerator such as sour kraut because I don't eat it or buy it and therefore I can safely assume there's no sout kraut in my fridge. I don't know anything about gods at all. I can't even begin to tell you why a God isn't in my fridge or anywhere else for that matter. "Assume" does not and cannot accurately describe my attitude toward the word "God". If you believe in God, and you attempt to convince me, I can reject your belief on the basis of your descriptions. I don't have to know or assume anything about gods to do that. Your words are fallible and the logical inconsistencies are enough to prevent me from adding Gods to a list of things that may or may not be in my refridgetator, much less anywhere else. Do you understand?

I understand, it eats at your craw you can't disprove my God, see I have all the proof I need, just because you do not accept it doesn't mean it's invalid, on the contrary when one argues against my God it gives validity to my God, it would take an insane person to argue against something they can prove doesn't exist.

GC

---

[The Valkyrie]

. . . it would take an insane person to argue against something they can prove doesn't exist.

GC

So you won't argue against Zeus, unicorns, Nessy, and invisible purple nothings?

NEVER lend an invisible, purple nothing your car!

Thieving bastards!

---

---

I understand, it eats at your craw you can't disprove my God, see I have all the proof I need, just because you do not accept it doesn't mean it's invalid, on the contrary when one argues against my God it gives validity to my God, it would take an insane person to argue against something they can prove doesn't exist.

GC

---

[Exian]

God's existence isn't what's being called into question in this thread. Nothing is being called into question. It's just a keen observation. It's there for you to comprehend or miss completely.

I'll go ahead and preemptively respond for the next few posts:

---

God's existence isn't what's being called into question in this thread.

---

---

God's existence isn't what's being called into question in this thread

---

---

Forget it.

---

[Godscreated]

. . . it would take an insane person to argue against something they can prove doesn't exist.

GC

So you won't argue against Zeus, unicorns, Nessy, and invisible purple nothings?

Are you saying they are not real?

GC

[Jenny A]

So you won't argue against Zeus, unicorns, Nessy, and invisible purple nothings?

Are you saying they are not real?

GC

I can not prove that they do not exist, but as there isn't any good evidence that they do exist, I don't believe in them. That would be my position about all gods including Zeus and Yahweh.

[The Reality Salesman01]

Use the buffalo in the fridge analogy.