Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 1, 2024, 2:23 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Unbelievers, refute this argument!
#21
RE: Unbelievers, refute this argument!
(April 14, 2015 at 9:24 am)Pizz-atheist Wrote:
  1. If cats exist, then Russell's teapot exists.
  2. Cats exist.
  3. Then, Russell's teapot exists.
The conclusion(3) follows logically and inescapably from the premises(1&2).   Indubitably Your move unbelievers! 

  1. If cats exist, then Russell's teapot exists.
  2. Conversely, if Russell's teapot exist then cats exist.
  3. Russell's teapot don't exist.
  4. Then, cats don't exist.
The conclusion(4) follows logically and inescapably from the premises(1,2&3). Indubitably Your move believers!
Quote:To know yet to think that one does not know is best; Not to know yet to think that one knows will lead to difficulty.
- Lau Tzu

Join me on atheistforums Slack Cool Shades (pester tibs via pm if you need invite) Tongue

Reply
#22
RE: Unbelievers, refute this argument!
Russell doesn't even exist anymore.  So fuck his teapot.
Reply
#23
RE: Unbelievers, refute this argument!
But cats do exist; therefore, Russell's teapot exists.
It is very important not to mistake hemlock for parsley, but to believe or not believe in God is not important at all. - Denis Diderot

We are the United States of Amnesia, we learn nothing because we remember nothing. - Gore Vidal
Reply
#24
RE: Unbelievers, refute this argument!
You can't even show that Russel had a cat.
Reply
#25
RE: Unbelievers, refute this argument!
If you think we're having trouble with Russel's cat, wait until I tell you about Schroedinger's Teapot...
How will we know, when the morning comes, we are still human? - 2D

Don't worry, my friend.  If this be the end, then so shall it be.
Reply
#26
RE: Unbelievers, refute this argument!
(April 14, 2015 at 2:49 pm)TRJF Wrote: If you think we're having trouble with Russel's cat, wait until I tell you about Schroedinger's Teapot...

. . . which rests on turtles -- turtles all the way down.
Reply
#27
RE: Unbelievers, refute this argument!
And in a nod to Douglas Adams, it contains tea and no tea at the same time.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist.  This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair.  Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second.  That means there's a situation vacant.'
Reply
#28
RE: Unbelievers, refute this argument!
Three pages and you unbelievers have failed to refute the Teapot. Why do you rebel against the Teapot?
It is very important not to mistake hemlock for parsley, but to believe or not believe in God is not important at all. - Denis Diderot

We are the United States of Amnesia, we learn nothing because we remember nothing. - Gore Vidal
Reply
#29
RE: Unbelievers, refute this argument!
1. If cats exist, Pizza's argument is refuted.
2. Cats exist.
3. Then, Pizza's argument is refuted.
I can't remember where this verse is from, I think it got removed from canon:

"I don't hang around with mostly men because I'm gay. It's because men are better than women. Better trained, better equipped...better. Just better! I'm not gay."

For context, this is the previous verse:

"Hi Jesus" -robvalue
Reply
#30
RE: Unbelievers, refute this argument!
(April 14, 2015 at 11:00 pm)Pizza Wrote: Three pages and you unbelievers have failed to refute the Teapot. Why do you rebel against the Teapot?

Cuz I hate tea.
Reply





Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)