RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
July 25, 2015 at 7:30 am
(This post was last modified: July 25, 2015 at 7:31 am by Crossless2.0.)
(July 25, 2015 at 7:12 am)robvalue Wrote: You've also been conflating historical and magic jesus since the minute you signed up, and you're still doing it despite everyone pointing this out.
What else can he do (aside from being honest about the nature of his source material)? If he were to stop conflating the two, he'd have little choice but to recognize that there is no sensible foundation to his religion. Christianity depends on this conflation and True Believers like Randy will fight tooth and nail to avoid facing up to that. The Gospels must depict history; it can't be otherwise for them. It's not a conclusion he arrived at rationally, despite his smokescreen of alleged "facts". It's his starting point.