(July 25, 2015 at 11:59 am)abaris Wrote:(July 25, 2015 at 11:58 am)KevinM1 Wrote: Wait... is Randy really saying that if historical Jesus existed, then he must have been miraculous and divine? Because that's patently idiotic. And it's not at all what his playing deck of academic sources are getting at.
Did you expect anything less from a person who can't even make a distinction between fact and hearsay?
That's just amazing to me. I mean, most scholars believe that Gautama Buddha existed historically, but that doesn't mean he actually found true enlightenment or that nirvana actually exists outside of a vague concept.
"I was thirsty for everything, but blood wasn't my style" - Live, "Voodoo Lady"