RE: The Statler Waldorf Balcony
October 21, 2010 at 3:05 pm
(This post was last modified: October 21, 2010 at 5:38 pm by Anomalocaris.)
(October 21, 2010 at 2:55 pm)Statler Waldorf Wrote: Ok, let's make an agreement, since I am kind of getting tired of this. How about we agree to both use our own sources and we will discuss their validity based on the material given? So I won't make fun of your youtube videos and you won't make fun of things just because they are from ICR or CMI? Deal? I think this will be much more productive and we will get more accomplished. Fair?
Your sources are ridiculous beyond the most lax standard of credibility, and failure to give them their due ridicule would give them a completely false air of some minimum of respectability. If your concept of discussing validity is based on using one piece of shit from your few favorite "creation scientists" to justify another, then I must decline to refrain from making fun of each link in your circular chain of shit.
You can reply with something vaguely similar sounding about ours. I have no doubt you will do that since aping serious arguments by substituting scientific facts with creationist bullshit is your primary tactic. But that reply would nonetheless reflect a more fundamental divide between us then your choice of tactic, which is you consider a myth from a rather repulsive band of desert nomades to be infallible absolute truths around which all must to made to conform, while we've found the myth to be in complete disagreement with what we’ve found and is therefore a complete piece of fictional garbage. The divide between us is as wide as any could possibly be. There is no need to waste time trying to bridge the unbridgeable. So long as you deem bible for some fundamental reason to be absolutely true and therefore are not honest open to critical review of just how good it is, we can not really discuss anything.
