RE: Supreme Court Same Sex Marriage Argumet
July 27, 2015 at 11:42 am
(This post was last modified: July 27, 2015 at 11:49 am by Ace.)
(June 29, 2015 at 5:12 pm)Aristocatt Wrote:(June 29, 2015 at 5:00 pm)Anima Wrote: Those are cursory argument devoid of proper details. Which would you like to argue?Happy to debate either. . .but just for fun:
In terms of societal. . .you bring up an awesome point! Resources are limited, and our population is exploding. The last thing we need is a higher proportion of straight people having too many kids and using up even more of our dwindling resources. So we should probably make marriage only for homosexuals in order to incentivize more people to be homosexual!!!
(July 27, 2015 at 11:23 am)Aristocatt Wrote: Free will and consent are not at all related. Your definition of consent itself has no qualms with rejecting free will.
What? (Consent) it is my own decision to engage in or agree with a said act. (Free) I freely, on my own decide what I wish to do. Both ask the the individual chose what they want.
Also if consent is not free will and the opposite to act free will is coercion, you do know that no marry can be granted if any party is coerced or are not acting in free will, right? The person then is not of sound mind and body; un-coerced, of free will.