(July 28, 2015 at 5:16 pm)Simon Moon Wrote: When I first joined this forum, I had the initial impression that Dritch had a bit better grasp on rationality than Christians I was running into at other sites.
That impression was quickly proven false, however.
As if the ancient (150 million years) existence of legs on the ancestors of modern snakes somehow provides evidence for the Biblical creation myths is laughable. Really Dritch, you may have reached a new low in rational thinking.
Again the thing is sport that the only example of a legged snake we have just so happens to be 150 million years old (supposedly
) even so, it does not mean that was the last legged snake in existence.Do you understand what that means?
It only means that that particular group of snakes with those specific type of legs 150 million years ago look like this.. That's not to say bigger snakes smaller snakes, snakes with 6 or more legs did not exist. It only means this one genus and species of snake existed how ever old they say this fossil to be. THAT DOES NOT MEAN no other legged snake or even this one particular genus and species did not exist well into the time Man walked the earth.
Remember flash, aligators got their start 150 million years before this fossil, and have not changed much since.
