(October 20, 2010 at 10:49 pm)solja247 Wrote:Quote:It's also easy to post formulaic phrases. But let's roll with it - actually it isn't, because you see, to truly be funny about something, you have to understand it.
I understand it, Im not saying it isnt funny. Im just saying creationists do the same thing. My brother was not a monkey! They even have comedians making evolution funny, but they attack it because they dont understand it. People do the same with God, they have too much baggage to understand.
Quote:It is easy to imagine one understands something that does not exist.
One does not know if God does or does not exist, so one should be careful with ones statements.
I don't see what baggage has to do with this funny (maybe not for you, but for most of us) image. The whole "no one knows" idea is foolish. No human has had or does have the perception to witness any god or objective truth. The argument itself is defeated by the fact that one should not have to debate whether god(s) exist or not, because there was never a human who could reach out of his/her own meager, subjective perception to witness such things as objective morality and god. Who's heard anything of god other than from other humans? Exactly.....mere folktales really. Could there be a creator? Maybe....but creation is something humans do, and there's never been any proof. Sounds like anthropomorphizing to me.
