Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: February 7, 2025, 4:18 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Should there be a Nobel Prize for Zoology?
#9
RE: Should there be a Nobel Prize for Zoology?
The main issue in expanding the prizes is that there's no end to the process. Suppose they add Zoology and Astronomy, as suggested. Then you have a hue and cry to award one for Electronics or Software Design. Physicists might want to specify categories for Optical Physics and Nuclear Physics. Chemists might want the Nobels to award specific medals and prize monies for Physical, Organic, and Colloidal Chemistry. Before long, you'd have 159 Nobel Prizes handed out every year, and the recipients would have to go all the way to Stockholm to pick up their $1.85.

This is why BAFTA don't hand out an award for Best Film Editing By A Left-Handed Zombie.

Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: Should there be a Nobel Prize for Zoology? - by Exian - August 7, 2015 at 10:00 pm
RE: Should there be a Nobel Prize for Zoology? - by BrianSoddingBoru4 - August 8, 2015 at 6:39 pm
RE: Should there be a Nobel Prize for Zoology? - by Handprint - September 2, 2015 at 9:59 pm



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)