RE: DEBUNKING THE CONSPIRACY THEORY
August 14, 2015 at 5:24 am
(This post was last modified: August 14, 2015 at 5:26 am by Pizza.)
(August 14, 2015 at 4:45 am)Neimenovic Wrote: Actually, this is the same thread all over again.If they don't have the biological evidence corroborating resurrections, I just don't care. All this is empty conjecture without hard evidence corroborating the vague, biased resurrection anecdotes. Nothing has changed since the last thread.
In the end, it can be broken down to:
'BBBBBUT THE TOMB WAS EMPTY!!!!1!1!1 WHAT'S YOUR THEORY HUH?!?!?!!'
All the objections to this line of thinking notwithstanding. I guess they're not in his scenario.
I really don't understand these kind of arguments about naturalism vs supernaturalism. Supernaturalists want to claim there are things beyond the scope of scientific investigation; yet, they rule out rival non-scientific claims with no argument or evidence. After all, if science is to be ignored by Christian theists then I don't see why non-Christian theists and atheists can't cook up non-scientific claims too without evidence.
Holy double standards!
It is very important not to mistake hemlock for parsley, but to believe or not believe in God is not important at all. - Denis Diderot
We are the United States of Amnesia, we learn nothing because we remember nothing. - Gore Vidal
We are the United States of Amnesia, we learn nothing because we remember nothing. - Gore Vidal
