(August 14, 2015 at 9:05 am)Randy Carson Wrote:(August 14, 2015 at 8:44 am)Neimenovic Wrote: Bravo! Do you even need me for this?
I'm starting to get really concerned Randy. Seriously. You keep repeating the same two things over and over ad nauseum, despite the fact that the flaw in your thinking has been pointed out to you several times by multiple people. Is it that you need a specific response to carry on with your pre written theatrics, or are you mentally incapable of acknowledging the problem with your argument?
Either way I honestly advise anyone who's attempting to have a conversation with Randy to skim through the last several pages of his previous thread, and then abandon the endeavor. Deeply disappointing is an understatement.
One other question for you, Nemo...previously, you wrote:
Quote:Actually, this is the same thread all over again.
In the end, it can be broken down to:
'BBBBBUT THE TOMB WAS EMPTY!!!!1!1!1 WHAT'S YOUR THEORY HUH?!?!?!!'
All the objections to this line of thinking notwithstanding. I guess they're not in his scenario.
The apostles began to preach the resurrection of Jesus in Jerusalem where Jesus was crucified and buried.
If the tomb wasn't empty, why didn't the authorities simply take the body from the tomb, parade it through the streets, and silence the Apostles?
It's part of the same story, Randy. The empty tomb is PART of the resurrection story. It can't be used as evidence for itself. Can you not see the circular logic in your argument?
I don't care how many scholars you can name that agree with you. Can you demonstrate the objective fact that there was a tomb and it was empty?
Cue the same rhetoric we've been hearing for a month......