The Statler Waldorf Balcony

[Statler Waldorf]

Refuted claims? I don't think anyone has refuted my claims of mine to date.

It's rather arrogant of you to sit there and lie about who is making these claims that you apparently claim are yours, particularly since none of them are your claims. These are claims that have been made by creationists for at least 150 years, and have all been refuted during that time. The fact that in order for you to continue to make these long-refuted claims is that you have to throw out every scientific finding that has been made in the last 150 years just makes you look stupid to the rest of the reasoning world.

"even the evolutionary biologist Richard Lewontin said, ‘We cannot allow a Divine Foot in the door’"

And do you know why he said that? He said it because "God did it" doesn't explain anything.

"So you are suggesting the Christian is lying?"

I have yet to meet or have a discussion with a creationist that doesn't lie (ladies and gentlemen, I give you the creationist (Statler) who claims that certain oopart drawings in Asia represent "recent" stegosaurs).

You are good at assertions, bad at argumentation. I thought you were supposed to be a Scientist, no wonder you don't work in your actual field.

I called them "my" claims because Sam called them my claims.

I know why he said that quote, he was talking about naturalism and how the super-natural explainations relate to ti. Not "God did it".

You are the one who is arguing using bad logic (I have pointed out numerous fallacies you have used) and evolutionary arguments that Creationists either agree with or have refuted over and over again.

I already addressed your OOPArt argument and why using the logic, "well this would mean dinosaurs lived along side man so it must be a fake" is bad Sciense.