Atheism the unscientific belief (part one, two, and three)

[Little Rik]

It doesn't seems that you pay much attention to what atheists post in these forums.
They keep on claiming that the universe does not need to be run by God or any form of consciousness.
It can run by itself they say.
Isn't this to say that there is no God?
If these people would say instead.......WE THINK THAT THE UNIVERSE CAN RUN BY ITSELF.....then it
would indicate that there is an absence of a belief in God but as far as they claim that there is no God
with the backing of their own science than they automatically make a claim and therefore
your claim that atheism is an absence in the believe in God is faulty.  

Science limits itself to evidentially supported facts. God is neither.

Napoleon asked the astronomer Laplace why his model of the solar system made no mention of god. Laplace answered that he "had no need of that hypothesis". So far no scientific discovery has required the insertion of supernatural entities to support them.

Your guessing is very silly.
Suppose you are in love with someone.
I pop up and i say to you.........FROM WHAT I CAN SEE THERE IS NO EVIDENCE THAT YOU ARE IN LOVE.
This is how science works.
Science only look at the material-physical aspect of the equation not at the consciousness one
therefore it miss the whole.
Physical science is doing his job but we can not say that the job is completed.
Part of the equation is missing and guess what?
You need a different type of science to completed the job to come up with 100% solution.
And this other science is not physical obviously.