If you look at random data with sufficient depth, you will find whatever patterns you are looking for.
It's not like the Quran is the only text that has religious bias and people with enough spare time to find spurious, false positive correlations.
Like finding faces in clouds or on the mountains of mars.
Jews do it--a lot--https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bible_code
Crazy Christians do it---
in elizabethan english http://www.revelation13.net/KingJames.html
in aramaic---http://www.biblecodedigest.com/page.php?PageID=418
and in greek---http://www.greaterthings.com/Word-Number...#1770-1792
Cheap computing power and public algorithms in recent years has given endless numbers of crackpots the ability to spew meaningless garbage over the internet.
Secular folk do it to show the data it 'reveals' is coincidental (or there are 'miracles' everywhere.)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bible_code
You just have to have relaxed standards for what you will accept as remarkable and a real drive to find what you want to find.
Confirmation bias and the Texas sharpshooter fallacy do this nicely.
You need to predict something that has not yet happened for your method to be true or useful.
Your statement that
"we do not have access to all that information because whether information is in a coded form or we are not yet matured to understand it."
Is simply an ad-hoc bogus rationalization of your inability to accurately predict future events which is the only possible, and to date, completely unproven, useful function of prophesy.
It's not like the Quran is the only text that has religious bias and people with enough spare time to find spurious, false positive correlations.
Like finding faces in clouds or on the mountains of mars.
Jews do it--a lot--https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bible_code
Crazy Christians do it---
in elizabethan english http://www.revelation13.net/KingJames.html
in aramaic---http://www.biblecodedigest.com/page.php?PageID=418
and in greek---http://www.greaterthings.com/Word-Number...#1770-1792
Cheap computing power and public algorithms in recent years has given endless numbers of crackpots the ability to spew meaningless garbage over the internet.
Secular folk do it to show the data it 'reveals' is coincidental (or there are 'miracles' everywhere.)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bible_code
Quote:Australian television personality John Safran and McKay again demonstrated the "tuning" technique, demonstrating that these techniques could produce "evidence" of the September 11 terrorist attacks on New York in the lyrics of Vanilla Ice's repertoire.http://www.apollowebworks.com/atheism/theomatics.html
Quote:So, I decided to run the program on a ridiculously UNholy text. Casting around for inspiration, I decided to copy the famous chain letter scam written by Dave Rhodes years ago, entitled "Make Money Fast". You can read the letter by clicking here.
I got lots and lots of phrases that were divisible by 111. Most were nonsense by themselves, but I managed to cull out several that were quite meaningful.
You just have to have relaxed standards for what you will accept as remarkable and a real drive to find what you want to find.
Confirmation bias and the Texas sharpshooter fallacy do this nicely.
You need to predict something that has not yet happened for your method to be true or useful.
Your statement that
"we do not have access to all that information because whether information is in a coded form or we are not yet matured to understand it."
Is simply an ad-hoc bogus rationalization of your inability to accurately predict future events which is the only possible, and to date, completely unproven, useful function of prophesy.
So how, exactly, does God know that She's NOT a brain in a vat?
