(August 20, 2015 at 11:05 pm)Randy Carson Wrote: Two questions come to mind:
1. Are you privy to how much money "he" donates to charity each year? The watch may represent a mere fraction of his total net worth.
Privy? No, because it's irrelevant. What he was wearing was completely superfluous, regardless of his net worth, which shouldn't be much for somebody in his position. This caused him immediately to be a hypocrite.
(August 20, 2015 at 11:05 pm)Randy Carson Wrote: 2. Are you confident that your own contributions to the poor are greater than his? Either as a percentage or in total?
Also irrelevant. I refuse to get into a dick size contest with him or you on the subject.
A man bitching to me about my contribution to the poor, shouldn't have one of these on his wrist:
![[Image: basel-2009-rolex-submariner-gold-steel-black-dial.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=www.ablogtowatch.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2009%2F03%2Fbasel-2009-rolex-submariner-gold-steel-black-dial.jpg)
I reject your reality and substitute my own!