Suppose somebody really does believe in continuity.
Then that will force them to believe in all the "energy" bullshit of the spirituality stuff too.
Like one of my teachers told the class to not go in pairs to church or someplace like that because our "energy" will coincide with one another and it will create some sort of distortion.So we must go to places like that alone.
Obvious bullshit right? So no - no continuity.
This feels like one of those instances when people didn't give a second thought to why things appeared smaller when they were kept farther from the person looking at it.
We have been teleporting all along people.But that would also mean that there is no such thing as infinity.Because according to what K told me,moving through an infinite set of points by spending an infinitely less amount of time in each of the points is what calculus is all about?
But wouldn't that mean that if i travelled through an infinite set of points by spending an infinitely less amount of time in each of the points that i'm moving in at a(almost) speed of infinity?
But i'm not moving at an almost speed of infinity.
[Almost in the speed of infinity in the sense that if 100 is the speed of infinity then the speed of "almost at the speed of infinity" would be 100-(an infinitely small number)]
I'd be very much appreciate if someone could tell me why i'm wrong
Then that will force them to believe in all the "energy" bullshit of the spirituality stuff too.
Like one of my teachers told the class to not go in pairs to church or someplace like that because our "energy" will coincide with one another and it will create some sort of distortion.So we must go to places like that alone.
Obvious bullshit right? So no - no continuity.
This feels like one of those instances when people didn't give a second thought to why things appeared smaller when they were kept farther from the person looking at it.
We have been teleporting all along people.But that would also mean that there is no such thing as infinity.Because according to what K told me,moving through an infinite set of points by spending an infinitely less amount of time in each of the points is what calculus is all about?
But wouldn't that mean that if i travelled through an infinite set of points by spending an infinitely less amount of time in each of the points that i'm moving in at a(almost) speed of infinity?
But i'm not moving at an almost speed of infinity.
[Almost in the speed of infinity in the sense that if 100 is the speed of infinity then the speed of "almost at the speed of infinity" would be 100-(an infinitely small number)]
I'd be very much appreciate if someone could tell me why i'm wrong
