The Statler Waldorf Balcony

[Statler Waldorf]

---

This could be the most ridiculous post I have seen on here. How does that make it wrong? Bad logic. So just because something hurts it is morally wrong? So is eating a hot pepper wrong? Tell me why it is your wrong according to your worldview. It should not be that hard of a question to answer.

Well and you still fail to understand huh? I guess you can't understand that there is much worser things than physical pain. And you speak to me of ridicule? Comparing rape to eating pepper? Are you this self absorbed? And I am the one using bad logic. I know what you are doing, its called projection, go read about it Mr Science teacher ROTFL. What do you mean with 'my worldview'? Are you trying to pass the "Atheists don't have a moral compass' idea? Guess what, we can do the right things without the fear from a sky-daddy. Besides, being atheist has nothing to do with morals, I am an atheist because I dont accept the claim made by theists that "There is a god", it doesn't tell you anything else, despite the fact that you numbnuts try to imply that. Who is the idiot now SW? I can be moral without your god, you need your god. Now from us two who is the more moral?

---

Actually you are the one who compaired rape and peppers since you said rape was only wrong because it hurts, and eating a pepper hurts so they must both be morally wrong right? Never said you cannot strive to be a moral person, just due to your worldview you have no reason to be one. You have not even given me a good idea as to what you base your morals on, much less a reason as to why you strive to be moral.

P.S. "worser" is not a word.

---

Don't you just love creationists? They seem to be one of the few groups of people for whom scientific facts are the work of the devil

Don't you just love Atheists? They have no idea what the term "Scientific Facts" even means.

---

If mental gymnastics was an Olympic event then I feel sure that Statler would be a gold medal winner.

His mental gymnastics is neither skillful nor graceful, he is like a fat man who clings clumsily to the parallel bars for dear life while shouting out all sorts of stupid reasons why he should get a perfect score, as if anyone cares.

So this is how you guys try and prove your point? Cute but meaningless. This is always the sign of a weak argument, so by all means ocntinue doing it- makes my job easier.

---

This thread was a bad idea. The ideas in it contained should have been split into more coherent seperate areas, like normal threads.

Time to let it die.

I did ask him to do this. He seemed to think it was "tidier" to have a load of completely unrelated ideas all bundled together in one über-thread.

Do you see Statler? This is why we do things our way, and not your way. Your way sucks.

Blah blah. I think this thread has worked very well. People can post several different questions in one post and not worry about whehter they are on topic or not. It has also cut down on the number of threads in this forum which is always a good thing.