I really think you only see what you want to see, Danny.
https://larryhurtado.wordpress.com/2014/...-argument/
Scholars continue to examine this stuff... whether you like it or not.
https://larryhurtado.wordpress.com/2014/...-argument/
Quote:This papyrus (part of the Bodmer Library collection), which preserves a goodly portion of the Gospel of John, is commonly regarded as one of our earliest NT manuscripts. In the Nestle-Aland Novum Testamentum Gracece (28th edition), for example, the date given for it is “ca. 200.” Various scholars place it in the early 3rd century CE. The basis for dating this papyrus (and nearly all manuscripts of literary texts) is palaeography: the scholarly analysis of the “hand” of the copyist. Nongbri challenges this dating, contending that palaeography doesn’t permit a date as precise as that assigned to P66. Instead, he argues, the “hand” exhibited in P66 could allow it to be dated anytime from very late 2nd century to the 4th century CE.
Scholars continue to examine this stuff... whether you like it or not.