(August 27, 2015 at 4:18 pm)Napoléon Wrote:My bold.(August 27, 2015 at 4:01 pm)Esquilax Wrote: I don't think "why do you need this deadly weapon?" is an unreasonable question to ask as a barrier of entry to gun ownership.
The only problem I foresee is that circumstances can change. Say a guy can demonstrate he needs a gun for any particular reason one year, what happens in 2 years time when he moves to the city? Or what happens if he suddenly gets depressed and wants to shoot himself? Might sound daft but shit happens. I think asking the question is a good start but there needs to be far more than that to ensure that those very few who do need guns continually meet the requirements/conditions.
But I'm still not at all convinced of any reason someone would need a gun. I just don't see it. So you have coyotes that come onto your property? Is that good enough reason alone to own a gun? I honestly think most places outside of America would say no.
Yeah, this is what I meant when I said we've all been there. I've had some pretty dark times; who knows what I would have been capable of in those moments had I owned a gun.
I think a good start on gun control would be to first attack the handgun angle. I don't see us ever being rid of rifles and shotguns, but maybe something happening with handguns could get the ball rolling in that direction.
I can't remember where this verse is from, I think it got removed from canon:
"I don't hang around with mostly men because I'm gay. It's because men are better than women. Better trained, better equipped...better. Just better! I'm not gay."
For context, this is the previous verse:
"Hi Jesus" -robvalue
"I don't hang around with mostly men because I'm gay. It's because men are better than women. Better trained, better equipped...better. Just better! I'm not gay."
For context, this is the previous verse:
"Hi Jesus" -robvalue