(22nd August 2015, 05:35)paulpablo Wrote: Wrote:The quran doesn't exclude the heart being a central organ responsible for the sensation of pain, it doesn't say the heart doesn't sense that the skin is burned, it doesn't say the brain does sense the skin is burned, it simply says the skin is burned and it will cause pain.
If the heart WAS responsible for the sensation of pain the quran verse would still be totally 100% correct wouldn't it?
Quote:Not at all. Man’s words always are influenced by the popular concepts. However, Quran does not reflect any popular idea of its time rather by giving skin a preference over the heart it had challenged all popular concepts concerning pain caused by burning skin.
Ok because of this response of yours I think you don't understand what it means that ancient people thought the heart was responsible for the sensation of pain. I don't think you're fully aware, you show a total lack of understanding.
I could be wrong, to clarify if you do or don't understand what it means can you -please go more in depth about what you think it means? What does it mean that ancient people thought the heart was responsible for the sensation of pain? How exactly did they think it worked?
Are you ready for the fire? We are firemen. WE ARE FIREMEN! The heat doesn’t bother us. We live in the heat. We train in the heat. It tells us that we’re ready, we’re at home, we’re where we’re supposed to be. Flames don’t intimidate us. What do we do? We control the flame. We control them. We move the flames where we want to. And then we extinguish them.
Impersonation is treason.
