(November 3, 2010 at 6:41 pm)Statler Waldorf Wrote: Actually we have eye wittness acounts that the flood did occur.
There are "eyewitness accounts" that the flood occurred?

Well, since only 8 people survived this "flood", then I guess you must have some type of original written account from one of these survivors.
Right?
Quote:That alone is infinitely more evidence than you have since you have no direct obsrvation of your claims.
There must "direct observation" that no flood took place? And how exactly do you come up with that? Do you expect us to provide ancient writings where the authors wrote something like, "No flood today."? But we don't even need this! If there was a global flood of the magnitude you believe within the last 10,000 years, there would be archaeological and geological evidence. There is none.
Quote:To go along with the eye wittness account we actually have mountains of evidence that supports a global flood event.
And this "evidence" is....?
Science flies us to the moon and stars. Religion flies us into buildings.
God allowed 200,000 people to die in an earthquake. So what makes you think he cares about YOUR problems?
God allowed 200,000 people to die in an earthquake. So what makes you think he cares about YOUR problems?