(November 4, 2010 at 2:59 am)ib.me.ub Wrote:theVoid Wrote:I love LSD, leave it alone
That shit will make you all FUCKED up.
Really, because i've taken it around 100 times, literally, and i'm none the worse for it, neither are the dozens of people who I know that have done the same (the entire psychedelic community)/
Not only that, but all of the major studies (you know the shit with evidence) found the same results.
ib.me.ub Wrote:theVOID Wrote:The question is whether or not they are banned for good reasons. I think it's fairly easy to make the case that 1) Making non-addictive recreational drugs legal will be largely positive 2) There exists a fairly atrocious and illogical double standard that can allow alcohol to be legal but not weed, LSD and ecstasy, all of which are less harmful in terms of social impact, physical health and addictiveness.
Who cares. They are banned substances.
I care, so do millions of other people who are threatened with persecution because a bunch of ignorant, historically motivated laws prevent me from smoking a joint after work while someone who has a few beers or a glass of wine is perfectly free to do so.
It's about double standards, and by definition they are unjustified.
If you want to do whatever the law currently says without having a mind to the contrary then that's your problem, but there are many instances of bad policy of which drug laws are only a tiny portion. Like all bad policy, it is the job of citizens to promote change to legislation.
Maybe you'd be better off in a dictatorship.
.
