RE: preachers on AF rant
August 31, 2015 at 9:27 am
(This post was last modified: August 31, 2015 at 9:50 am by drfuzzy.)
(August 31, 2015 at 8:27 am)Drich Wrote:(August 30, 2015 at 4:31 pm)drfuzzy Wrote: I believe that my original post states that I clicked on the links.Again sport, what if those were your 'remembrances'? (If you did click on BOTH links provided you would be speaking to not only the instance I have described but the principle driving it, you only speak to the instance which tells me you did not read the other link like you said you did or you do not understand it.)
arguement should be spelled "argument". envolved should be spelled "involved". "he willing to invest the effort" -- really now.
Don't bother investing your time, Drich. Really. Nothing you can possibly type is going to have any effect on me other than wasting our time. No personal story, no bible verse, no quote, no author, no theologian's argument, no cute remembrance - - I do not accept any of that as "proof".
Either way the question now is if God sent you a messenger to out line your whole life for you (past present and future) would you deny Him?
That is the question you seem to be avoiding/do not understand.
(Maybe if you did not spend so much time grading spelling you might be able to have/hold a topical conversation.)
Sport??? "Nothing you can possibly type is going to have any effect on me other than wasting our time." Ok, I lied. I wasted time reading this, and now I'm angry at myself. You can't comprehend even the simplest of sentences, can you? I do not accept any of your so-called "principles". I do not accept any of your stories. I do not respect your theologians or your Bible, and your GOD is a made-up asshole with less value than the Lucky Charms Leprechaun. And now I'm blocking you.
"The family that prays together...is brainwashing their children."- Albert Einstein
