RE: What Human Rights?
August 31, 2015 at 5:42 pm
(This post was last modified: August 31, 2015 at 5:45 pm by IATIA.)
(August 31, 2015 at 5:17 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: Those are also all pretty liberal sources. Neim already posted a couple other articles that were much more objective. It was blown out of proportion in the way it was presented in the guardian.
Regardless of your dislike of the sources, it does not change the facts of the position of the church stated by Cardinal Alfonso Lòpez Trujillo.
BBC Wrote:The WHO has condemned the Vatican's views, saying: "These incorrect statements about condoms and HIV are dangerous when we are facing a global pandemic which has already killed more than 20 million people, and currently affects at least 42 million."
The organisation says "consistent and correct" condom use reduces the risk of HIV infection by 90%. There may be breakage or slippage of condoms - but not, the WHO says, holes through which the virus can pass.
I tried some catholic sites and they repeat the same information, but of course with their apologetic nonsense..
As far as abstinence, even the fucking catholic priests cannot keep their dicks in their pants.
You make people miserable and there's nothing they can do about it, just like god.
-- Homer Simpson
God has no place within these walls, just as facts have no place within organized religion.
-- Superintendent Chalmers
Science is like a blabbermouth who ruins a movie by telling you how it ends. There are some things we don't want to know. Important things.
-- Ned Flanders
Once something's been approved by the government, it's no longer immoral.
-- The Rev Lovejoy
-- Homer Simpson
God has no place within these walls, just as facts have no place within organized religion.
-- Superintendent Chalmers
Science is like a blabbermouth who ruins a movie by telling you how it ends. There are some things we don't want to know. Important things.
-- Ned Flanders
Once something's been approved by the government, it's no longer immoral.
-- The Rev Lovejoy
