|
the Science of deconversion?
|
I truly think it comes down to the fact that people are incapable (generally speaking) of accepting the enormity of the universe (let alone a multiverse with dimensionally anomalies) and that they would have less than a whelks chance in a super nova.
"The Universe is run by the complex interweaving of three elements: energy, matter, and enlightened self-interest." G'Kar-B5
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Possibly Related Threads... | |||||
| Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
| Age of Deconversion | John 6IX Breezy | 138 | 18211 |
November 28, 2019 at 2:09 pm Last Post: downbeatplumb |
|
| Deconversion and some doubts | Jake | 232 | 25845 |
August 13, 2019 at 11:28 am Last Post: GrandizerII |
|
| Observational Science vs. Historical Science?! | Duke Guilmon | 8 | 3935 |
April 27, 2014 at 6:53 pm Last Post: MJ the Skeptical |
|
| The Process of Deconversion | FallentoReason | 6 | 3295 |
January 12, 2013 at 5:36 pm Last Post: Angrboda |
|
| Deconversion issues. | Ziploc Surprise | 19 | 8281 |
November 1, 2011 at 1:02 pm Last Post: Ziploc Surprise |
|
