Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: July 23, 2025, 12:03 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Subatomic Particles Communicating
#3
RE: Subatomic Particles Communicating
I guess it doesnt offer proof, so I should strike that word from the statement. But it offers
support for modern spiritual belief. People who say God can't communicate with every single
person, this scratches the surface of that thought. Also, prior to this discovery, a few people
who had a near death experience and reported it, said that they were able to be anywhere
at the speed of a thought. They thought it, and they went. This was also covered in the the book
Many Lives, Many Masters.

(November 10, 2010 at 4:53 am)Tiberius Wrote: ...and this jar of peanut butter is my evidence against spiritual proof!

Seriously, you are just going to name a quantum mechanical effect and not explain how it "proves" spiritualism? C'mon...do a little better than that; you are God after all.

Thinking
The fact we can debate if things exist or not, except for our personal existence, proves that we are inhabiting matter. This is the soul.
Thinking
Reply



Messages In This Thread
Subatomic Particles Communicating - by God - November 10, 2010 at 4:35 am
RE: Subatomic Particles Communicating - by Tiberius - November 10, 2010 at 4:53 am
RE: Subatomic Particles Communicating - by God - November 10, 2010 at 5:11 am
RE: Subatomic Particles Communicating - by ib.me.ub - November 10, 2010 at 5:31 am
RE: Subatomic Particles Communicating - by God - November 10, 2010 at 6:46 am
RE: Subatomic Particles Communicating - by orogenicman - November 10, 2010 at 6:45 am
RE: Subatomic Particles Communicating - by ib.me.ub - November 10, 2010 at 8:15 am
RE: Subatomic Particles Communicating - by Jaysyn - November 10, 2010 at 10:55 am
RE: Subatomic Particles Communicating - by Autumnlicious - November 10, 2010 at 7:33 pm
RE: Subatomic Particles Communicating - by God - November 10, 2010 at 9:29 pm
RE: Subatomic Particles Communicating - by Anomalocaris - November 12, 2010 at 12:30 am
RE: Subatomic Particles Communicating - by Jaysyn - November 12, 2010 at 7:07 am
RE: Subatomic Particles Communicating - by ib.me.ub - November 11, 2010 at 11:16 pm
RE: Subatomic Particles Communicating - by God - November 16, 2010 at 10:49 am
RE: Subatomic Particles Communicating - by The Skeptic - November 12, 2010 at 12:25 am
RE: Subatomic Particles Communicating - by ib.me.ub - November 12, 2010 at 10:36 am
RE: Subatomic Particles Communicating - by Lethe - November 17, 2010 at 4:49 pm
RE: Subatomic Particles Communicating - by Welsh cake - November 12, 2010 at 11:33 am
RE: Subatomic Particles Communicating - by ib.me.ub - November 12, 2010 at 11:46 am
RE: Subatomic Particles Communicating - by Welsh cake - November 12, 2010 at 12:29 pm
RE: Subatomic Particles Communicating - by Autumnlicious - November 12, 2010 at 7:02 pm
RE: Subatomic Particles Communicating - by Autumnlicious - November 17, 2010 at 4:18 pm
RE: Subatomic Particles Communicating - by Anomalocaris - November 17, 2010 at 4:46 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Are Particles Theoretically Tangible? JairCrawford 51 6916 March 30, 2022 at 11:40 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  What is Meant by "Charge" for Elementary Particles? Rhondazvous 20 3333 February 10, 2016 at 8:58 pm
Last Post: Alex K
  Are Particles 'Physical Things' or 'Abstract Ideas'? Mudhammam 56 12124 April 15, 2015 at 6:45 am
Last Post: bennyboy
  Massless Elementary Particles = Bodies of Mass? Mudhammam 7 1978 October 19, 2014 at 9:59 pm
Last Post: Alex K



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)