Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: February 15, 2025, 7:14 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Subatomic Particles Communicating
#16
RE: Subatomic Particles Communicating
(November 10, 2010 at 4:35 am)God Wrote: "Aspect and his team discovered that under certain circumstances subatomic particles such as electrons are able to instantaneously communicate with each other regardless of the distance separating them. It doesn't matter whether they are 10 feet or 10 billion miles apart.

Somehow each particle always seems to know what the other is doing. The problem with this feat is that it violates Einstein's long-held tenet that no communication can travel faster than the speed of light. Since traveling faster than the speed of light is tantamount to breaking the time barrier,........"
Now where exactly are these findings of the experiments and their results published? And did physicist Alain Aspect and his team from the University of Paris undergo the peer-review scientific process at all? l don't ever recall the discovery of hypothetical subatomic particles, like Tachyons, to actually manifest in reality, that's not to say they don't, but to date, there's no empirical evidence for any of this.


(November 10, 2010 at 5:11 am)God Wrote: People who say God can't communicate with every single person, this scratches the surface of that thought. Also, prior to this discovery, a few people who had a near death experience and reported it, said that they were able to be anywhere
at the speed of a thought.
That's a non sequitur. I fail to grasp how subatomic particles as evidence for your god concept have any correlation with people's hallucinatory personal experiences when they're on the verge of biological death.

And please, don't tell me to look at the birds and trees next.


Quote:im fully aware of brain chemical based spirituality.
Brain chemical based what?


Quote:but you should do more researce on the topic of NDE's. these reports are coming from people whos medical charts say they were clinically dead. meaning heart was stopped, and there was no brain activity whatsoever. not even a bleep, bloop, etc. and yet these people were having full on experiences throughout.
It's just a medical term - clinical death is an *assessment* following examination it is NOT the same thing as permanent biological death. The human body can survive clinical death for considerable time periods.


Quote:either we must change the way we consider death clinical, or this is revolutionary. do some research. as for weak evidence, this is all we as spiritualists have. for we understand that life is not about debating whats beyond it, but about debating whats within it.
So all you have is testimonial evidence. Great. There are also people who will tell you they've been abducted by aliens. What reason do we have to believe any such claims as truth?
Reply



Messages In This Thread
Subatomic Particles Communicating - by God - November 10, 2010 at 4:35 am
RE: Subatomic Particles Communicating - by Tiberius - November 10, 2010 at 4:53 am
RE: Subatomic Particles Communicating - by God - November 10, 2010 at 5:11 am
RE: Subatomic Particles Communicating - by ib.me.ub - November 10, 2010 at 5:31 am
RE: Subatomic Particles Communicating - by God - November 10, 2010 at 6:46 am
RE: Subatomic Particles Communicating - by orogenicman - November 10, 2010 at 6:45 am
RE: Subatomic Particles Communicating - by ib.me.ub - November 10, 2010 at 8:15 am
RE: Subatomic Particles Communicating - by Jaysyn - November 10, 2010 at 10:55 am
RE: Subatomic Particles Communicating - by Autumnlicious - November 10, 2010 at 7:33 pm
RE: Subatomic Particles Communicating - by God - November 10, 2010 at 9:29 pm
RE: Subatomic Particles Communicating - by Anomalocaris - November 12, 2010 at 12:30 am
RE: Subatomic Particles Communicating - by Jaysyn - November 12, 2010 at 7:07 am
RE: Subatomic Particles Communicating - by ib.me.ub - November 11, 2010 at 11:16 pm
RE: Subatomic Particles Communicating - by God - November 16, 2010 at 10:49 am
RE: Subatomic Particles Communicating - by The Skeptic - November 12, 2010 at 12:25 am
RE: Subatomic Particles Communicating - by ib.me.ub - November 12, 2010 at 10:36 am
RE: Subatomic Particles Communicating - by Lethe - November 17, 2010 at 4:49 pm
RE: Subatomic Particles Communicating - by Welsh cake - November 12, 2010 at 11:33 am
RE: Subatomic Particles Communicating - by ib.me.ub - November 12, 2010 at 11:46 am
RE: Subatomic Particles Communicating - by Welsh cake - November 12, 2010 at 12:29 pm
RE: Subatomic Particles Communicating - by Autumnlicious - November 12, 2010 at 7:02 pm
RE: Subatomic Particles Communicating - by Autumnlicious - November 17, 2010 at 4:18 pm
RE: Subatomic Particles Communicating - by Anomalocaris - November 17, 2010 at 4:46 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Are Particles Theoretically Tangible? JairCrawford 51 4908 March 30, 2022 at 11:40 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  What is Meant by "Charge" for Elementary Particles? Rhondazvous 20 2853 February 10, 2016 at 8:58 pm
Last Post: Alex K
  Are Particles 'Physical Things' or 'Abstract Ideas'? Mudhammam 56 10562 April 15, 2015 at 6:45 am
Last Post: bennyboy
  Massless Elementary Particles = Bodies of Mass? Mudhammam 7 1783 October 19, 2014 at 9:59 pm
Last Post: Alex K



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)