(September 15, 2015 at 5:53 pm)mh.brewer Wrote: "It's always been" sounds like the same old god argument to me. Your putting forward the concept, now it's up to you to prove.how it 'sounds' is irrelevant. what matters is whether it's consistent and explains the concept. my proof is the argument which you haven't addressed. instead you asked questions on what an idealist world would look like. I answered your questions, if you want to question the evidence for the concept look at the argument.
"no, you don't recover no matter what's in the IV". Not true. You still recover is it's glucose, that one of the no matter what's.
"physical interactions still have a consistent behavior" Physical interactions are an action of matter, not an action of the mind perceiving matter. Therefore matter exists outside the minds perception.
You can continue with the rest here, I'm through. I find your logic flawed.
really? 'you don't recover no matter what's in the IV' means you can't put just anything in the IV and you'll recover regardless...
your counter there is question begging... you're presuming what 'material interaction' is based on a materialistic view rather than evidence.
if you find my logic flawed, why don't you address the argument?
I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with senses, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use and by some other means to give us knowledge which we can attain by them.
-Galileo
-Galileo
