I suspect that the opposite is true someway, meaning that the old religions are the ones which people adhere to, since the new religions aren't very inspiring in their message.
In any case, religion keeps people gathered somehow, and I assume that due to that fact, religion will always exist, but change its form from time to time, adapting itself to the local culture.
Let's take for example Soviet Russia.. the people were forced to adandon religion, but eventually it didn't reduce crimes or evil deeds at all.. so from that example I can infer, that religion is a necessity for people as a whole for their existence.
On the other hand, take for example Germany.. I don't think that religion there is very influential and the people manage to live normally, until the time they encounter great difficulties, and then religion will rise up again in its strongest sense.
I think I've come to a conclusion: If you want to destroy Muslims- destroy their religion instead
In any case, religion keeps people gathered somehow, and I assume that due to that fact, religion will always exist, but change its form from time to time, adapting itself to the local culture.
Let's take for example Soviet Russia.. the people were forced to adandon religion, but eventually it didn't reduce crimes or evil deeds at all.. so from that example I can infer, that religion is a necessity for people as a whole for their existence.
On the other hand, take for example Germany.. I don't think that religion there is very influential and the people manage to live normally, until the time they encounter great difficulties, and then religion will rise up again in its strongest sense.
I think I've come to a conclusion: If you want to destroy Muslims- destroy their religion instead
