(September 17, 2015 at 12:42 am)Shuffle Wrote:(September 17, 2015 at 12:38 am)Lek Wrote: I like how the guy admits all the holes in the theory, but is 100% confident that it will be proven correct. But, anyway, it does nothing to answer the question about the existence of the cosmos. He also didn't address the fact that this process completely relies on all the chemicals involved to already exist prior to the beginning of the process. It's like answering the question of how a clock is made by saying that you take all the parts that already exist and assemble them. Do you think that there was a time that absolutely nothing existed and, after that something did exist? Or do you think that something always did exist in infinity?
Cosmology is not the same as biology, you idiot.
And yes, according to the Conservation of Mass and Energy, matter is eternal.
Okay. I'll insert "universe" for "cosmos". Thanks for answering my question as I wondered what you thought about that. It's tough for me to consider the material world as never having a beginning. It seems to me to be a supernatural quality. From your point of view, there is really no purpose to the existence of the universe. I can't get into that, but to each his own.
