(September 21, 2015 at 8:57 pm)TheRocketSurgeon Wrote: No, I think RAKD has a good point, here. It's important to consider both word usage and context. Even though many translations of the Bible use the word "rape" for the later verses (28-29), others do not. Young's Literal uses "caught":
Caught, discovered, observed, seen, noted, discerned, etc...
Doesn't honestly matter to me what word is used, I don't see how it would change the meaning. The great misogynist in the sky doesn't care unless there's a third party. Again going back to the word of a man against that of property. I take issue with whatever translation you care use.
Defense of this verse and whatever moral or parabolic teachings it's trying to impart is simply idiotic, like most of the bible.
I reject your reality and substitute my own!
