RE: Creation vs. Evolution
February 28, 2009 at 8:18 pm
(This post was last modified: February 28, 2009 at 8:19 pm by Becki.)
I appretiate you trying not to overwhelm us, adrian. On previous forums, some people would bombard us with a ton of info, and then when it took us days to get through, they accused us of not having answers. This is a lot better, and actually, kind of fun for once. XD
First of all, Amanda doesn't want you to debate the big bang, particularly. We don't really care. If you want to, that's fine. If not, that's fine with us too.
Next. I agree with most of what you said. I have the perfect example we learned about in school. Beetles on a windy island. These beetles had a mutation where they lost their wings. It actually helped the beetles, because they didn't blow away into the water. But I have a couple of points to make here. First, the mutation was a loss of information, not a gain. No one has ever observed a species GAINING info. Second, although the beetles changed, they did not turn into a totally different species, like a frog. I believe that a species can change within its species, but that there are limits.
So basically, the beetles are an example of micro-evolution. That's all that has EVER been observed. What evolutionists typically refer to as evolution is Macro-evolution, which has never been observed. Any comments?
First of all, Amanda doesn't want you to debate the big bang, particularly. We don't really care. If you want to, that's fine. If not, that's fine with us too.
Next. I agree with most of what you said. I have the perfect example we learned about in school. Beetles on a windy island. These beetles had a mutation where they lost their wings. It actually helped the beetles, because they didn't blow away into the water. But I have a couple of points to make here. First, the mutation was a loss of information, not a gain. No one has ever observed a species GAINING info. Second, although the beetles changed, they did not turn into a totally different species, like a frog. I believe that a species can change within its species, but that there are limits.
So basically, the beetles are an example of micro-evolution. That's all that has EVER been observed. What evolutionists typically refer to as evolution is Macro-evolution, which has never been observed. Any comments?
