Young Earth Creationism Vs. Science (Statler Waldorf Contd)

[Minimalist]

The Supreme Court decision which held that creationism:

The Act impermissibly endorses religion by advancing the religious belief that a supernatural being created humankind. The legislative history demonstrates that the term "creation science," as contemplated by the state legislature, embraces this religious teaching. The Act's primary purpose was to change the public school science curriculum to provide persuasive advantage to a particular religious doctrine that rejects the factual basis of evolution in its entirety. Thus, the Act is designed either to promote the theory of creation science that embodies a particular religious tenet or to prohibit the teaching of a scientific theory disfavored by certain religious sects. In either case, the Act violates the First Amendment.

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/edwards-...llard.html


Not that Shitwit will care but for those of you who are more interested in law than in fucking religious mumbo-jumbo.