RE: Two possibilities...
September 30, 2015 at 6:52 pm
(This post was last modified: September 30, 2015 at 6:53 pm by TheRocketSurgeon.)
(September 30, 2015 at 6:39 pm)KUSA Wrote:(September 30, 2015 at 6:32 pm)Drich Wrote: Sorry Randy did not know you were a brother.
Next time if you take issue with anything I say, then take it to me first/Pm me. (or not I have no issue hashing it out in public, I just think it is better to try and follow what the bible says about Christian conflict rather than brother against brother in the heathen arena)(for you stims)
What you can't recognize a fellow christard?
The fact is, no two christards believe the same thing. Jesus tells different lies to everyone.
No need to insult them, KUSA, not in this case. But I did "prophesy" this exact "dust-up", just a page back.
I'm more concerned with the fact that the cultists can't see that they don't ever ever again get to tell us that we have to treat them with respect, when they are now admittedly under orders not to even let us see that they don't have a united front on doctrine.
New doctrine: "Lie to atheists. It's okay. God hates them."
Brother against brother. Psh.
(September 30, 2015 at 11:26 am)TheRocketSurgeon Wrote: Wow, Drich. Way to spell out why all the Catholics are frauds. Rather than answering your nonsense (like completely missing my point about picking and choosing focus doctrine, re: divorce v. gayness), I'll just let the Catholics here tear you up on that one.
A Christian told me: if you were saved you cant lose your salvation. you're sealed with the Holy Ghost
I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love.
I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love.
