(March 1, 2009 at 4:18 pm)fr0d0 Wrote:(March 1, 2009 at 4:15 pm)Even Adam Wrote: How about responding to the substance of the post, rather than the manner in which you perceived it to have been written?Because he's referring to a topic where I've answered him clearly several times, and he's seeking to undermine me here.
I have no problem discussing my belief or lack of belief, I'm just not up for being bullied into it.
Yep you answered me there alright. And I answered you. Evidence is rational. But you say its irrational regards to God. Yet your only alternative you won't display.
What are we talking about exactly then?
Impotent topic that goes nowhere? (I'm talking about your topic not this one, I didn't bring it up first).
Now if you want to carry on with this innane banter (or perhaps even display an alternative or somehow get somewhere) then it should be done back there.
And I'm not undermining you, I was responding to what you said. In context.
