RE: Quandary
October 16, 2015 at 7:44 am
(This post was last modified: October 16, 2015 at 7:47 am by Edwardo Piet.)
One of the worst of the worst arguments for God's existence was by Anselm:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ontological_argument
He's such a fucktard. Dawkins dealt with it easily in TGD.
David Hume dealt with the B.S pretty well too, from the same Wiki article:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ontological_argument
He's such a fucktard. Dawkins dealt with it easily in TGD.
David Hume dealt with the B.S pretty well too, from the same Wiki article:
David Hume owning Anselm's ass Wrote:...there is an evident absurdity in pretending to demonstrate a matter of fact, or to prove it by any arguments a priori. Nothing is demonstrable, unless the contrary implies a contradiction. Nothing, that is distinctly conceivable, implies a contradiction. Whatever we conceive as existent, we can also conceive as non-existent. There is no being, therefore, whose non-existence implies a contradiction. Consequently there is no being, whose existence is demonstrable.