Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: February 2, 2025, 11:08 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Christopher Columbus was awful (but this other guy wasn't)
#15
RE: Christopher Columbus was awful (but this other guy wasn't)
It might be even deeper than that, Yeaux.  The Vikings would have been as much carriers of European diseases as Columbus' crew.  Yet, there is no evidence of disease outbreaks from Viking times.  Had there been, one would have expected to see some degree of resistance to those diseases when Europeans did arrive.

In his book, 1491, Charles Mann points out that while colonization of North America did not begin until the early 17th century there had been contact as fishermen from Europe began checking out American waters.  They would put in for water and provisioning and their contact with native-americans was sufficient to begin the spread of the various epidemics which utterly decimated the indigenous population long before colonists arrived.

It's quite a good book.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: Christopher Columbus was awful (but this other guy wasn't) - by Minimalist - October 16, 2015 at 8:18 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The French Christopher Hitchens. Brian37 2 1089 April 15, 2015 at 11:46 am
Last Post: Minimalist



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)