(October 16, 2015 at 11:20 pm)Kitan Wrote: Proof of providing a name is not proof that one is the son of god.
I freaking swear, theists suck so much at logic.
Well you know who I am now, that much is for sure. However, if you are interested in atheism, or God or gods, you might want to find out a little more about me. I am not saying that's up to you. I've told you that you can research ancestry to prove that I am of cilia, and then a discussion can actually break out as to the actual source of the name. This is what I meant with my first paragraph of the OP (that the debate will get heated, etc). After all, the source of a "from cilia" name would be none other than discussing one who bears the resemblance of a God. However it appears that the name Killingsworth itself (on reflection) would bear the weight of proof at the son of God. And again that brings up topics about the debate at the time.
But that spells enough proof that I am the son of God. And yes, any investigation into this further would only result in proof of the claim, or "fact." So I see no use in crying about atheists and their misuse of logic, but I do see use in crying about atheists and their inability to use logic.
