(October 20, 2015 at 9:55 pm)heatiosrs Wrote: I told you very specifically I don't know the definition, clearly indicating I was not an expert on the subject.
Yeah - neither is anyone else. It's just a bunch of quacks, spewing word salad, that sounds sensible to people with no idea. They're selling magic beans, with the help of some scientifically sounding lingo.
(October 20, 2015 at 9:55 pm)heatiosrs Wrote: There's google for a reason you know.[...]
You can find all manners of quacks and cranks on google. From people healing cancer with prayer - to perpetual motion machine scams. Google won't do the critical thinking for you, although you can also easily google "binaural beats scepticism", or something.
(October 20, 2015 at 9:55 pm)heatiosrs Wrote: I explained what my description of "Brain activity" is and why I think I "know" that.
You did? I must have missed it. Could you cite your credible scientific sources again, please? Quack websites don't really count.
Neither does this:
(October 20, 2015 at 9:55 pm)heatiosrs Wrote: Obviously there are people who use their brains much more than others throughout the day, regardless of "IQ" levels. To me, "Brain Activity" is simply the measurement of this.
What does "using one's brain" mean? Brains do all sorts of things - a lot of them subconsciously. I don't know how exactly you can tell who uses their brains to what extent "throughout the day" - and there sure as hell isn't anything "obvious" about it.
Whenever something appears so obvious to you, that you don't think it requires research, or evidence - it's a good sign you might be wrong.
"The fact that a believer is happier than a skeptic is no more to the point than the fact that a drunken man is happier than a sober one." - George Bernard Shaw
