(October 23, 2015 at 12:46 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: Minimalist stated that creationism is bs. obviously that statement has to be based upon something other than "i don't know".
Gosh, perhaps it's based on the fact that absolutely no aspect or claim of creationism has been demonstrated to even be possible, let alone true? That several aspects of creationism (here's a timeless creator!) are downright incoherent conceptually?
Maybe those things?

Quote:Here's the thing, the big bang requires just as much faith as creationism. You can't accept the idea of a creator, but you CAN seem accept creation happening spontaneously out of nothing.
Thought you guys referred to that as magic?
No, we actually have evidence for the big bang, like cosmic microwave background radiation. Not that I'd expect you to understand something before you open your mouth, since you apparently don't even know what the big bang is, based on your description. I'll give you a hint: the big bang is an event, it says nothing about the state of affairs before it, so your insipid "creation happening spontaneously out of nothing," shit is just a strawman.
Your desperation to put a scientifically supported hypothesis on the same level as your magic just so story is cute, though.

Quote:If that's what you want to "believe", fine. But you have no evidence for that being the case.
Which is why Rob specifically said he doesn't know a page before he posed that comment. Good to see that not only are you not bothering to comprehend the basic concepts you're talking about, you also aren't taking in what people are saying to you before you disagree with them.

"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!