Here's why Creatards might be right

[Esquilax]

isnt science based on nature ; chemistry , biology and physics behaving in a certain predictable way ? theories of nature have been tested repeatedly and scientists have determined that these laws of nature do exist and are well defined and predictable . are you suggesting that natural laws dont really exist and instead are completely random and unpredictable ?

Consistency doesn't have to be designed though. If you have an identical cause, of course the effect is going to be the same; why are you assuming that it wouldn't be? Why are you assuming that without a designer, two identical causes would produce completely random, diffuse effects?

This is the problem here: you're just inserting completely random assumptions into your argument and then expecting everyone else to clean up your unjustified premises.