Atheism the unscientific belief (part one, two, and three)

[Angrboda]

I thought we were talking about evidence.  Where's the evidence for any of this?

Yog, you remind me that slow learning kid that needed private tutoring because he couldn't get the message the first time in class.
So let me be your tutor hoping to wake up your dormant mind.
How do we know that there are layers and layers in the mind?
Simple.
If there wouldn't be any you wouldn't need to think and think.
The answer would come straight away in your mind or even better it would be already there.
You wouldn't need to think.
But we all think because very often the answer is not there.
By thinking we penetrate the inner layers of the mind and after some time the answer pop up.
Not always of course because most people haven't trained their mind so they can only penetrate
some of the inner layers which i guess is a major problem even in this forum.  

Lame. This isn't evidence, it's a just-so story. It's just made up. Worse than that, this evidence also fits the fact that the physical neurons take time to fire. In other words, this evidence is compatible with both stories, and so it's evidence for neither story.

When are you going to provide the evidence for parallelism of consciousness and body, huh?