(November 8, 2015 at 10:35 am)Rhondazvous Wrote:(November 7, 2015 at 10:54 pm)Redbeard The Pink Wrote: Evidence that the Ziggurat of Babylon existed and evidence that the "Tower of Babel" existed are not the same thing, dipshit. You provided evidence that the tower in the story was (maybe) based on a real landmark, but you've done nothing to prove the truth of the biblical account. There is nothing to concede.Drippy's standard for what constitutes evidence is somewhat below sea level.
I've got 4 very well known historical all who claim to know of/ have been to the site, and they describe what was there. I also have historical record of Alexander the Great clearing the site and trying to rebuild.. ALL from non biblical sources...
Do you even know/understand what constitutes as evidence in that time frame?