(November 9, 2015 at 2:13 pm)jenny1972 Wrote: [quote pid='1109399' dateline='1447090346']
" Again, All I've done is take a full reading of what you have cut up and are now in full denial about again. "
all the verses i put in my comments i copy and pasted directly from the following website [/url][url=http://www.jesuswordsonly.com/recommendedreading/175-pauls-contradictions-of-jesus.html]http://www.jesuswordsonly.com/recommendedreading/175-pauls-contradictions-of-jesus.html
as you can see i did not add or subtract anything from the bible verses that were on the website you can see for yourself they are exactly as listed there what is in my comments. I trust this website far more than i trust any corrupted translation of verses that have questionable legitimacy to begin with
" The Law was divided up into three sections in the OT. Cermonial law, Communial (of which dietary laws were included) and Moral law. Moral law demanded a blood sacrifice and a turning of sin/repentance. Dietary concerns simply made one unclean for a few days. a cleaning cermony and quarrentine was all that was required to be absolved of those sins. "
how do you know any of that is true? just because a book says something is true doesnt make it true there are many different religions that have things written down in a book that doesnt mean that every religion is true . why do you think your religion is true why should anyone believe that its true ?
" Jesus' sacrifice Paid all that was owed.(completing the law) Meaning Jesus' work on the cross paid for the quarrentine time and the cleansiing cermony which means that no longer had to be done. In essence all food was made clean UNLESS you could not reconcile this truth with yourself, then it became a moral law violation.
With a Moral law violation Jesus paided the blood sacrifice part but the repentance is still due/something only you can do. So that means All Moral sin still require the sinner to turn from their sin "
how do you know any of that is even true and that jesus did that ?
" Again, being Homosexual has absolutely nothing to do with the identification of their sin. They are in sexual sin because they have sex (what Kind is irrelevant) outside the confines of a sanctified marriage, and Jesus did infact speak on/Against that. Their sin is sexual in nature, just like all other sexual sin. Meaning it is not unforgivable IF one repents of it, one will never repent if one can somehow make sin 'moral.' "
so sex within marriage is ok right? so again homosexual sex within sanctified marriage is fine , the fact that christian ministers perform marriage ceremonies for gay couples proves that not all christians agree with your interpretation of what does and does not constitute a " sanctified marriage ",so what proof do you have that your interpretation is right and everyone else is wrong ?
" Just because you want to pretend the bible is silent, does not mean the bible grants you permission. Because again ALL SEX OUTSIDE OF A SANCTIFIED MARRIAGE Is Still A SIN!!! Jesus Very Specifically said those people (People steeped in sexual sin) would NOT enter Heaven. This means two things, Homosexuals have always had the 'equality' they've been clammering for, in they are doomed to the same hell as all Heterosexual sexual sinners are, and at the same time have the same oppertuities to repentance as the rest of us do as well. "
why should anyone have respect for anything that is contained in this bible ? we dont know if its even true or not first determine that something is true and then if something is shown to be true and legitimate then there is value in studying it , what makes christianity more true than any other religion . what proof do you have that christianity is true ? only after its established that something is true can there be serious discussion about its details . but if its all a lie why would anyone be interested in studying a lie ? noone is going to believe its true just because you say it is you dont believe greek mythology is true just because many people used to believe in it right or just because the myths were written in books
[/quote]
I asked you to do a couple of things for me before we can continue. I need to know you are indeed reading what I write TO YOU (It seems ironically enough you can read just fine what I write to other people)