RE: To take or not to take Syrian refugees
November 17, 2015 at 2:51 pm
(This post was last modified: November 17, 2015 at 2:52 pm by paulpablo.)
(November 17, 2015 at 12:25 am)Catholic_Lady Wrote: Should 1st world countries in the west take in Syrian refugees?
Yes with the condition that either they pay for their own housing, health care, food and education or other people volunteer the money to give them. And either they or volunteers pay for the administration funds it will take to monitor them all coming into the country.
The monitoring system should ensure that no high risk drug users/ terrorists/ criminals are among the refugees and also it would be preferable if they can at least be literate in their own language.
So basically as long as no taxes which are forcibly taken from the 1st world population by the government are used to pay for anything to do with any of the procedure. It has to be an unforced, genuinely charitable plan of action with responsibility and caution taken relating to the people coming in to the country.
Are you ready for the fire? We are firemen. WE ARE FIREMEN! The heat doesn’t bother us. We live in the heat. We train in the heat. It tells us that we’re ready, we’re at home, we’re where we’re supposed to be. Flames don’t intimidate us. What do we do? We control the flame. We control them. We move the flames where we want to. And then we extinguish them.
Impersonation is treason.
