RE: TruthisGod vs. LemonVariable72
November 18, 2015 at 3:24 pm
(This post was last modified: November 18, 2015 at 3:24 pm by Edwardo Piet.)
(November 18, 2015 at 3:20 pm)TruthisGod Wrote: So it appears that I have to first define what God is in order to have a debate on his existence. That's fine. God is easy to define, and I'm not going to change anything from his traditional definition. You won't be surprised, because as I said before, I think we all know what God is, and I think this tactic of demanding a definition is just a typical dodge by atheists. But I will open a new topic so can define God and also lay out other terms for the debate.
We all know what God is? "The supernatural creator of the universe" is the standard definition but how can that be supported if he is indistinguisable from his non-existence and thus it doesn't seem 'He' really 'is' anything at all?
In fact, anything supernatural at all seems to be completely indistinguishable from its nonexistence.
If it was natural it could be detected at the very least by science.
